6 Judgment of the Court of 20 November 2001. Zino Davidoff SA v A & G Imports Ltd and Levi Strauss & Co. and Others v Tesco Stores Ltd and Others. Reference for a preliminary ruling : High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division (Patent Court) - United Kingdom. Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 7(1) - Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark - Goods placed on the m
6 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2009. L'Oréal SA, Lancôme parfums et beauté & Cie SNC and Laboratoire Garnier & Cie v Bellure NV, Malaika Investments Ltd and Starion International Ltd. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) - United Kingdom. Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks - Article 5(1) and (2) - Use in comparative advertising -
5 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 November 2004. Peak Holding AB v Axolin-Elinor AB (formerly Handelskompaniet Factory Outlet i Löddeköpinge AB). Reference for a preliminary ruling : Hovrätten över Skåne och Blekinge - Sweden. Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 7(1) - Exhaustion of the rights conferred by a trade mark - Putting on the market of the goods in the EEA by the proprietor of the trade mark - Concept - Goods offered for sale to consumers and then withdrawn - Sale to an operator established in the EEA with the obligation to put the goods on the market outside the EEA - Resale of the goods to another operator established in the EEA - Marketing in the EEA. Case C-16/03.
5 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2009. Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel and Société industrielle lingerie (SIL). Reference for a preliminary ruling : Cour de Cassation - France. Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade-mark law - Exhaustion of the rights of the proprietor of the trade mark - Licence agreement - Sale of goods bearing the trade mark in disregard of a clause
4 Judgment of the Court of 12 November 2002. Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew Reed. Reference for a preliminary ruling : High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Chancery Division - United Kingdom. Approximation of laws - Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(a) - Scope of the proprietor's exclusive right to the trade mark. Case C-206/01.
4 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 15 October 2009. Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands. Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade-mark law - Exhaustion of trade mark proprietor’s rights - Placing of goods on the market in the European Economic Area by a third party - Impli
3 Judgment of the Court of 20 March 2003. LTJ Diffusion SA v Sadas Vertbaudet SA. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Tribunal de grande instance de Paris - France. Trade marks - Approximation of laws - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(a) - Notion of sign which is identical with the trade mark - Use of the distinctive element of the mark to the exclusion of other elements - Use of all the elements making up the trade mark but with the addition of other elements. Case C-291/00.
3 Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 7 July 2005. Praktiker Bau- und Heimwerkermärkte AG. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Bundespatentgericht - Germany. Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks in respect of services - Registration - Services provided in connection with retail trade - Specification of content of services - Similarity between the services in question and goods or
3 Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 April 2006. Levi Strauss & Co. v Casucci SpA. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Cour de cassation - Belgium. Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 5(1)(b) - Relevant time for assessing likelihood of confusion between a trade mark and a similar sign - Loss of distinctive character owing to conduct of the proprietor of the trade mark after use of
3 Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2007. Céline SARL v Céline SA. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Cour d'appel de Nancy - France. Trade marks - Articles 5(1)(a) and 6(1)(a) of First Directive 89/104/EEC - Right of the proprietor of a registered trade mark to oppose the use by a third party of a sign which is identical to the mark - Use of the sign as a company, trade or sho
3 Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 April 2008. adidas AG andt adidas Benelux BV v Marca Mode CV and Others. Reference for a preliminary ruling : Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands. Trade marks - Articles 5(1)(b), 5(2) and 6(1)(b) of Directive 89/104/EEC - Requirement of availability - Three-stripe figurative marks - Two-stripe motifs used by competitors as decoration - Complaint alle